Banner advertisements by

Re: reasoned response

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by robertlh on May 11, 2011 at 14:07:41:

In Reply to: reasoned response posted by FK on May 11, 2011 at 12:37:53:

I haven't a clue who you are since you didn't use a name or sign the post, but I do like your line of thinking. Exactly what I was saying in my "concerned" post.

These guys were "apparently" in clear violation of the Code of Conduct since they are CBJ's. That's assuming they were drinking beer/alcohol - I don't recall if that was proven, or guilty by association of drinking something in the beer tent. I'm still not condoning their actions and still support the decision - just wish Paul Harvey was here to give the rest (the whole) story. That's my L.E. coming out again.

Now another twist for discussion - and Fast Eddy eluded to this below - what about non-CBJ's. They really don't have a mechinism to get this info (it's part of the CBJ process), so are non-CBJ's bound by this "rule" (Code of Conduct)? As long as they are not "intoxicated" and don't drink "during" judging - are they ok?

Interesting discussion.

Robert in Garden City

Follow Ups:

The BBQ Forum Home Page

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C)

[ BBQ Search ]