Banner advertisements by

Re: reasoned response????

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by William on May 11, 2011 at 15:58:44:

In Reply to: reasoned response posted by FK on May 11, 2011 at 12:37:53:

The three "master" judges didn't deny they were drinking beer and implied that they were indeed drinking beer by attempting to defend themselves by saying they couldn't drink DURING judging. They are the ones who set everything in motion by not admitting up front they were violating their code of conduct, by not apologizing and not offering to withdraw from judging. They insulted Steph, threatened to write a column about her in the BullSheet and instead of apologizing for screwing up, went and told the organizer that it was Steph's and the rep's fault that they wouldn't be judging. I don't see how anyone can defend them under the guise of a so-called "reasoned response." If Steph's story is inaccurate, they certainly could come here and post their side. I can't imagine they don't know this discussion is taking place.

Follow Ups:

The BBQ Forum Home Page

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)

[ BBQ Search ]