Banner advertisements by bbqads.com

Re: Disqualified question


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by robertlh on September 21, 2011 at 00:38:36:

In Reply to: Re: Disqualified question posted by John in RVA on September 20, 2011 at 22:52:06:

I agree with you John but I will also say this - I've witnessed a judge(s) nearly performing an autopsy on a chicken entry - almost deliberately looking for a spotch of red. Obviously the napkin test revealed a less than clear color. (If you poke around on anything long enough, you'll find something wrong.)

The judge was asked if he/she really felt the chicken was under-cooked to score it according to the instructions and criteria and yup - they gave it a 2. Disheartening. That chicken was done and then some - but we can not influence the judge - only reinforce that they understand the criteria and score accordingly.

Robert in Garden City


Follow Ups:



The BBQ Forum Home Page

Source:
d068.tns.wbsnet.net
216.144.111.68
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; eSobiSubscriber 2.0.4.16; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C)



[ BBQ Search ]